|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Epson UltraChrome K3 Ink
|
Epson UltraChrome K3 Ink with Vivid Magenta
|
Finding the correct printer settings was a bit of a search on the Epson site, however this description is from the profiles site
- The Epson Exhibition Fiber Paper is intended to be used with the "Photo Black" ink of the Epson UltraChrome K3 Ink or UltraChrome K3 Ink with Vivid Magenta ink sets. Under the Media Type, you should choose "Premium Luster Photo Paper" or "Premium Luster Photo Paper (260)" depending on your printer. For 3800/4800/4880 printers, you can load paper in the top feed (regular feed path) but with single sheets only. Loading more than one sheet at a time will result in mis-feeds. For Epson Stylus Photo R2400 Printers you must load single sheets of Exhibition Fiber Paper through the rear Single Sheet Guide. For additional information on using the rear Single Sheet Guide path see your user guide or visit the R2400 product page.
Print Quality
I printed a variety of images on an Epson 4880, both colour and black and white.

It's very difficult to give a feel for a paper in a web review, but the picture above gives an impression of the richer black in the TPP print (A3+) to the right, compared with the same image printed (A3) using the Epson ABW mode on Premium Luster paper to the left. This may or may not make some images look better - deciding this is very much a matter of taste.
It actually took me several prints to get good results.
First of all, the flakes...
Inside the pack of paper were lots of small white flakes of surface coating. The picture below has had the brightness of the black bag bumped up to show the flakes

Out came my trusty feather duster - this is excellent for cleaning the surface of papers that shed fibres or flakes.

The sheet below shows what happens if you are not thorough enough. When the print is dry, flakes come off leaving white specks.
Since I've no desire to go back to the darkroom practice of 'spotting' prints, this was a dud...

Next there is the issue of raising the platten height for the printer

This was before I set it to 'W' and shows a head strike ... another dud :-(
OK, it's fine for me to mess around with settings, but this isn't a cheap paper, so a bit more info and guidance would have been nice.
The prints do look excellent with not too much difference in gloss between the paper and inked areas (any slight colours in the reflection are due to the halogen ceiling lights used to get the reflection)

...and not much gloss 'gaps' showing up in highlights (the print below is the one of the drummer above)

The paper surface is relatively fragile so be careful in taking sheets out of the box, and be careful stacking sheets (I use thin tissue paper, after prints have dried).
The image below printed with tremendous depth in the bits of mountain poking through the cloud.

Summary
Remember that paper choices are a very personal thing, so always go for a sample and see how you 'feel' about the print quality. This is something very important for my big prints and varies with subject matter, print size and where the prints are destined to hang.
The quality is excellent, with deep rich colours and blacks that can look like holes in the paper (it's got an excellent D-max)
It's not a cheap paper ('reassuringly expensive' was probably on the minds of the marketing group that decided this).
Given it took 5 prints for me to initially get a perfect one, you would want to be very careful in using it. The surface flakes were a serious problem if you didn't clean the surface thoroughly, and you should handle the paper with great care (it scratches easily).
If you can justify the cost, and take care in using it, then it is a splendid paper with a distinctive look.
A personal health warning about paper reviews ;-)
One of my pet hates is when I see comparative reviews of papers in some magazines that include a stack of spurious tables and diagrams covering various measurements about printer/paper/ink performance. Most are utterly meaningless (without -detailed- explanations of the theory and practice behind them). The most egregious nonsense is posting gamut volume numbers to six figure accuracy... Assume that the graphs are there to bulk out the article or make the reviewer look clever ;-)
Similarly I just couldn't be bothered to measure the D-max of many papers (how black is black) - there is so much more to what makes a fine print than some spurious measurement accuracy. Note that I don't apply this when I'm making profiles, that's one time I am bothered about lots of measurements and their accuracy and their consistency.
I have a few colour images that I'll print on a heavy matt rag paper on my old Epson 9600. It really has a somewhat restricted gamut due to the ink limits and original Ultrachrome Inks I use. The images just work on that paper. Gamut and D-max are just two aspects of deciding how you want your prints to look.
Print choices are a personal thing - if you just choose papers by numbers then your prints will (IMHO) lack something.
Other related info
- Epson 4880 review
- Epson 3880 review
- All our paper reviews
- Black and white test image - a very harsh (but fair) test
- Colour management links on this site
- B/W Printing - based on an interview with Keith Cooper in 2007
- Media settings and profiling for third party inks
Keith converted an Epson Stylus COLOR 1160 to third party inks. In describing the profiling of a this set-up with a third party glossy paper, he shows how that often neglected aspect of profiling -driver media settings- can make all the difference between a so-so print and one that he would be happy to send out as a sample to his commercial clients. - The PrintFIX PRO review - good profiling package with black and white options
- Printer profiling with the Eye One Photo - review
- Why don't my prints match my screen?
A short article showing why there is more to getting your prints to match your screen, than just calibrating your monitor. It's the vital first step, but you do need to consider some other factors for best results. - Reviews on this site
- Other Articles on this site
Northlight Images prides itself on its independence when giving advice. We do not sell hardware or software and have no direct commercial links with any of the software or hardware vendors that may be mentioned here. See our Review Policy for more information.
Explore our site... Digital Black and White photography and printing - some of Keiths thoughts, techniques and tips for those interested in a digital approach to black and white. We've lots of original Photography Articles and Photography Reviews on the site to help anyone interested in photography. New site content appears on the What's New page.
Thanks to the visitors who've made Amazon purchases (any kinds of items whatosever)via: Amazon UK/
It won't save extra money we're afraid, but it does help in the running of the site, and we really appreciate it...
Northlight Images is based in Leicester in the UK and supplies Commercial Photography services
Visiting Leicester or wondering where it is? We have views from the Leicester traffic cameras.

